On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 02:47:13PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * David G. Johnston (david.g.johnston@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:42 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > The downside is you end up with X-1 dummy sections just to allow for
> > > references to old syntax, and you then have to find them all and remove
> > > them when you implement the proper solution. I have no intention of
> > > applying such an X-1 fix.
> >
> > X = 2; seems like a strong objection for such a minor issue. The status
> > quo seems worse than that.
>
> I've been thinking about this and I think I'm on Craig and David's side-
> having something cleaner, and clearer, than just http redirects and such
> would be good for these cases and I don't think we are going to end up
> with so many of them that it ends up becoming an issue.
We were not going to use just redirects --- we were going to create a
page that had all the renames listed, with links to the new names.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
