Greetings,
* David G. Johnston (david.g.johnston@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:42 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > The downside is you end up with X-1 dummy sections just to allow for
> > references to old syntax, and you then have to find them all and remove
> > them when you implement the proper solution. I have no intention of
> > applying such an X-1 fix.
>
> X = 2; seems like a strong objection for such a minor issue. The status
> quo seems worse than that.
I've been thinking about this and I think I'm on Craig and David's side-
having something cleaner, and clearer, than just http redirects and such
would be good for these cases and I don't think we are going to end up
with so many of them that it ends up becoming an issue.
Thanks,
Stephen
