Re: pg_upgrade analyze script - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_upgrade analyze script
Date
Msg-id 20201111012127.GD2276@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade analyze script  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade analyze script  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 10:21:04AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> You should just remove those calls.  There is no need to replace them with
>> vacuumdb calls.  The reason those calls were there is that they were testing
>> the generated script itself.  If the script is gone, there is no more need.
>> There are already separate tests for testing vacuumdb.
>
> True, 102_vacuumdb_stages.pl already does all that.

Let's fix that.  From what I can see it only involves the attached,
and as a bobus it also reduces the number of extra characters showing
on my terminal after running pg_upgrade tests.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking LOCK TABLE's behavior on views