Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_upgrade analyze script - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_upgrade analyze script
Date
Msg-id 20201110012104.GB1887@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade analyze script  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade analyze script  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> You should just remove those calls.  There is no need to replace them with
> vacuumdb calls.  The reason those calls were there is that they were testing
> the generated script itself.  If the script is gone, there is no more need.
> There are already separate tests for testing vacuumdb.

True, 102_vacuumdb_stages.pl already does all that.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Adding an aminsert() hint that triggers bottom-up index deletion for UPDATEs that can't use HOT
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions