Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Date
Msg-id 20201015162039.GA1329@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Sep-30, Craig Ringer wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 22:09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:

> > I happened to come across this thread by accident, and I tend to agree
> > that we need to install both isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress to
> > the pgxs dirs, just like we do pg_regress.  I can't find that
> > isolationtester is installed anywhere though; maybe that changed after
> > you posted this.  Anyway, this version of the patch installs both.

> I think rules were added to allow the isolation tester to be installed with
> an explicit make -C src/test/isolation install, but not added to the
> default "install" target.
> 
> I agree it should just be installed.

Pushed, thanks.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: Minor documentation error regarding streaming replication protocol
Next
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: Packaging - Packages names consistency (RPM)