On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 05:44:57AM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> Hi Bruce, Tom,
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 03:43:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
> >> >> I was hoping someone more experienced with this would comment, but
> >> >> seeing none, I will apply it in a day or two to all supported versions?
> >> >> Have you tested this output back to 9.5?
> >>
> >> > I hoped that as well. No, I tested down to 9.6 because the change happened in 10.
> >>
> >> The patch assumes that parallel query is enabled, which is not true by
> >> default before v10, so it should certainly not be applied before v10
> >> (at least not without significant revisions).
>
> Yes, the behavior change was in 10. Before 10 the example is fine, I would not apply that to any prior version,
otherwisethe whole example needs to be rewritten.
Agreed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
