Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class
Date
Msg-id 20200923015742.GD16803@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Missing TOAST table for pg_class  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 05:35:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What exactly do you argue has changed since the previous decision
> that should cause us to change it?  In particular, where is the
> additional data to change our minds about the safety of such a thing?

Not sure that's safe, as we also want to avoid circular dependencies
similarly for pg_class, pg_index and pg_attribute.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories