On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 01:25:27PM +0300, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> Yes, this version is good.
Thanks. I have added an extra comment for the case of RELKIND_INDEX
with REINDEXOPT_MISSING_OK while on it, as it was not really obvious
why the parent relation needs to be locked (at least attempted to) at
this stage. And applied the change. Thanks for the review,
Anastasia.
--
Michael