On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 05:09:05PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That could be helpful. Wouldn't it be better to use "end-of-recovery
> checkpoint" instead? That's the common wording in the code comments.
>
> I don't see the point of patch 0002. In the same paragraph, we
> already know that this applies to any checkpoints.
Thinking more about this.. Could it be better to just add some calls
to set_ps_display() directly in CreateCheckPoint()? This way, both
the checkpointer as well as the startup process at the end of recovery
would benefit from the change.
--
Michael
