On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:10:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > We are inconsistently about adding a comma after e.g. and i.e.:
>
> > This summarizes the recommended behavior:
> > https://jakubmarian.com/comma-after-i-e-and-e-g/
> > In British English, “i.e.” and “e.g.” are not followed by a comma, so
> > the first example above would be:
> > They sell computer components, e.g. motherboards, graphic cards, CPUs.
> > Virtually all American style guides recommend to follow both “i.e.” and
> > “e.g.” with a comma (just like if “that is” and “for example” were used
> > instead), so the very same sentence in American English would become:
>
> > So, what do we want to do? Leave it unchanged, or pick one of these
> > styles?
>
> I think it's fairly pointless to try to enforce such a thing.
> Even if you made the docs 100% consistent on the issue today,
> they wouldn't stay that way for long, because nobody else is
> really going to care about it.
>
> (FWIW, I generally write a comma myself. But I'm not going
> to cry about text that hasn't got one.)
I wasn't worried about enforcing going forward, but rather if we should
make what we have now consistent.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
