Re: Parallel copy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Parallel copy
Date
Msg-id 20200804162144.djylr3agyoq2usfs@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel copy  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel copy
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 12:33:48PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 9:55 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The patches were not applying because of the recent commits.
>> I have rebased the patch over head & attached.
>>
>I rebased v2-0006-Parallel-Copy-For-Binary-Format-Files.patch.
>
>Putting together all the patches rebased on to the latest commit
>b8fdee7d0ca8bd2165d46fb1468f75571b706a01. Patches from 0001 to 0005
>are rebased by Vignesh, that are from the previous mail and the patch
>0006 is rebased by me.
>
>Please consider this patch set for further review.
>

I'd suggest incrementing the version every time an updated version is
submitted, even if it's just a rebased version. It makes it clearer
which version of the code is being discussed, etc.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Error on failed COMMIT
Next
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Amcheck: do rightlink verification with lock coupling