Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
Date
Msg-id 20200709222004.GA10331@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Jul-09, Tom Lane wrote:

> and even the most cursory look at the code confirms that there's a
> real bug here.  KeepLogSeg expects *logSegNo to be defined on entry,
> but GetWALAvailability hasn't bothered to initialize oldestSlotSeg.
> It is not clear to me which one is in the wrong; the comment for
> KeepLogSeg isn't particularly clear on this.

Oh, so I introduced the bug when I removed the initialization in this
fix.  That one was using the wrong datatype, but evidently it achieved
the right effect.  And KeepLogSeg is using the wrong datatype Invalid
macro also.

I think we should define InvalidXLogSegNo to be ~((uint64)0) and add a
macro to test for that.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Stale external URL in doc?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk