Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES
Date
Msg-id 20200518170323.GA14610@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Missing grammar production for WITH TIES  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
Responses Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-May-18, Vik Fearing wrote:

> The syntax for FETCH FIRST allows the <fetch first quantity> to be
> absent (implying 1).
> 
> We implement this correctly for ONLY, but WITH TIES didn't get the memo.

Oops, yes.  I added a test.  Will get this pushed immediately after I
see beta1 produced.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is pq_begintypsend so slow?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vintage unused variables in pg_dump.c