Re: Configuring Replication in Windows 2016 using Postgresql 9.x - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From zurich@nym.hush.com
Subject Re: Configuring Replication in Windows 2016 using Postgresql 9.x
Date
Msg-id 20200425212428.95082C06FD@smtp.hushmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Configuring Replication in Windows 2016 using Postgresql 9.x  (Luis Marin <luismarinaray@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
I had this misfortune to support a Dev DB on 9.3 PostgreSQL running on Win server 2008 R2 which I had the joy of taking
from9.3 to 9.4, 9.5 and 9.6 in fits and starts. Thankfully Production ran on Debian Linux which would upgrade
faultlessly

This looks like it might be a file ownership issue, was PostgreSQL installed under an account called Postgres or the
networkservice account? Which account owns the Postgres files and which account is running the Postgres Service
process?Is the ownership/ acls of the WAL files correct or matching and are they being deleted correctly?
 

As I recall Postgres 9.3 expected the install to be made using a non-privileged  Postgres account whereas this changed
inlater versions to expecting the network service account to be used instead.
 

Hope this helps,

Peter G.

On 25/04/2020 at 6:13 PM, "Luis Marin" <luismarinaray@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Dear PostgreSQL friends:
>
>I have a terrible task.
>
>Build a replication schema using a Windows Server2016 and 
>PostgreSQL 9.3.
>
>I know, I know , I could have desired, a better or most recent 
>PostgreSQL
>version, but nope
>
>My current configuration:
>
>Master Server:
>postgresql.conf:
>
>wal_level = hot_standby
>
>archive_mode = on
>
>archive_command = 'copy "%p" "\\\\127.0.0.1\\archive\\%f"'
>
>max_wal_senders = 5
>wal_keep_segments = 10
>
>pg_hba.conf:
>
>host     replication     rep_user       IP-replica  slave/CIDR     
>    trust
>
>
>Slave Server:
>
>
>postgresql.conf:
>
>Hot_Standby=On
>
>
>recovery.conf
>
>restore_command = 'copy "\\\\x.y.z.78\\Archive\\%f" "%p"'
>
>standby_mode = 'on'
>
>primary_conninfo= 'host=x.y.z.78 port=5432 user=rep_user 
>password=rep_user'
>
>trigger_file = 'c:\\temp\\primary_down.txt'
>
>I have made a successfully switch-over, but my new slave server, 
>does not
>want to be online
>I have enabled more detailed debug info, and the only message that 
>appears
>is:
>
>2020-04-25 11:49:36 COT DEBUG:  attempting to remove WAL segments 
>older
>than log file 00000000000000000000004A
>2020-04-25 11:49:36 COT DEBUG:  SlruScanDirectory invoking 
>callback on
>pg_multixact/offsets/0000
>2020-04-25 11:49:36 COT DEBUG:  SlruScanDirectory invoking 
>callback on
>pg_multixact/members/0000
>2020-04-25 11:49:36 COT DEBUG:  SlruScanDirectory invoking 
>callback on
>pg_multixact/offsets/0000
>
>My log file keeps growing, but the postgresql service fails to 
>start with a
>timeout message and never comes online.
>what could be happening ?
>
>Please, any idea, can help me
>Thanks a lot friends for your postgresql-wise
>
>Best Regards




pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Scott Ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: Startup process in slave
Next
From: Ashok kumar Mani
Date:
Subject: RE: Help needed for replication issue