Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id 20200423162302.GA4210@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:04:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I've played with this a bit, and there are certainly a lot of 
> > interesting things that you can do with CSS nowadays that would preserve 
> > some semblance of semantic markup on both the DocBook side and the HTML 
> > side.
> 
> As I said, I'm happy to do the legwork of improving the markup if someone
> will point me in the right direction.  But I know next to zip about CSS,
> so it would not be productive for me to do the basic design there ---
> it would take too long and there would probably still be lots to criticize
> in whatever I came up with.

I can do the CSS if you tell me what you want.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators