Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Date
Msg-id 20200412193912.2dty2r66wvc57ahm@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-04-12 11:21:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> We could also have an alternate name, like pgsql, and make 'pg' a
> symlink to it that packagers can choose to omit.

We could even name the non-abbreviated binary postgres :).

Sure, that'd cause a bit more trouble upgrading for people that scripted
starting postgres without going through pg_ctl or such, but OTOH it'd
not cause new naming conflicts. And all that'd be needed to fix the
start script would be 's/postgres/postgres server/'.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?