Re: doc review for v13 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: doc review for v13
Date
Msg-id 20200410030150.GZ2228@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: doc review for v13  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: doc review for v13  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:27:46AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 11:56:53AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I previously mailed separately about a few individual patches, some of which
> > have separate, ongoing discussion and aren't included here (incr sort, parallel
> > vacuum).
> 
> I have gone through your changes, and committed what looked like the
> most obvious mistakes in my view.  Please see below for more
> comments.

Thanks - rebased for cfbot and continued review.

>  required pages to remove both downlink and rightlink are already  locked.  That
> -evades potential right to left page locking order, which could deadlock with
> +avoid potential right to left page locking order, which could deadlock with
> Not sure which one is better, but the new change is grammatically
> incorrect.

Thanks for noticing

"Evades" usually means to act to avoid detection by the government.  Like tax
evasion.

>        <varname>auto_explain.log_settings</varname> controls whether information
> -      about modified configuration options are printed when execution plan is logged.
> -      Only options affecting query planning with value different from the built-in
> +      about modified configuration options is printed when an execution plan is logged.
> +      Only those options which affect query planning and whose value differs from its built-in
> Depends on how you read the sentence, but here is seemt to me that 
> "statistics" is the correct subject, no?

Statistics ?

>      <literal>_tz</literal> suffix. These functions have been implemented to
> -    support comparison of date/time values that involves implicit
> +    support comparison of date/time values that involve implicit
> The subject is "comparison" here, no?

You're right.

-- 
Justin

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple FPI_FOR_HINT for the same block during killing btreeindex items