Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES
Date
Msg-id 20200331152442.GA4829@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A rather hackish POC for alternative implementation of WITH TIES  (Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Mar-26, Surafel Temesgen wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 3:35 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
> wrote:
> 
> > >>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> >
> > I was largely holding off on doing further work hoping for some
> > discussion of which way we should go. If you think my approach is worth
> > pursuing (I haven't seriously tested the performance, but I'd expect it
> > to be slower than Surafel's - the price you pay for flexibility) then I
> > can look at it further, but figuring out the planner stuff will take
> > some time.
>
> Other alternative can be pushing the existing implementation
> which will be open to change in case of better-finished
> implementation.

At this point, I think that's what we should do.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fix for BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree