On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:32:25PM +0100, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> > > + <glossterm>Archiver</glossterm>
> > Can you change that to archiver process ?
>
> I prefer the short term without the addition of 'process' - concerning
> 'Archiver' as well as the other cases. But I'm not an native English
> speaker.
I didn't like it due to lack of context.
What about "wal archiver" ?
It occured to me when I read this.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200327.163007.128069746774242774.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
--
Justin
