Re: Parallel grouping sets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Parallel grouping sets
Date
Msg-id 20200319020914.zkcjpm5r4yj7umqx@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel grouping sets  (Pengzhou Tang <ptang@pivotal.io>)
Responses Re: Parallel grouping sets  (Pengzhou Tang <ptang@pivotal.io>)
Re: Parallel grouping sets  (Pengzhou Tang <ptang@pivotal.io>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

unfortunately this got a bit broken by the disk-based hash aggregation,
committed today, and so it needs a rebase. I've started looking at the
patch before that, and I have it rebased on e00912e11a9e (i.e. the
commit before the one that breaks it).

Attached is the rebased patch series (now broken), with a couple of
commits with some minor cosmetic changes I propose to make (easier than
explaining it on a list, it's mostly about whitespace, comments etc).
Feel free to reject the changes, it's up to you.

I'll continue doing the review, but it'd be good to have a fully rebased
version.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_progress_basebackup - progress reporting forpg_basebackup, in the server side