Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date
Msg-id 20200309021203.GB96055@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 10:09:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks to both of you for the reviews.  Please note that I will
> mention the business with pg_ctl and logging in a new  thread and
> remove the diff of pg_ctl.c from the previous patch, and that the doc
> changes could be backpatched down to 12 for the relevant parts.  The
> documentation for PG_COLORS is still missing, but that's not new and I
> think that we had better handle that case separately by creating a new
> section in the docs.  For now, let's wait a couple of days and see if
> others have more thoughts to share about the doc patch of this thread.

Hearing nothing, done.  The part about pgbench with PGHOST, PGUSER and
PGPORT could go further down, but it has been like that for years so I
did not bother.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: More tests to stress directly checksum_impl.h
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Exposure related to GUC value of ssl_passphrase_command