Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
Date
Msg-id 20200307010923.GB1531@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench  (Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PG_COLOR not mentioned in docs of vacuumlo, oid2name and pgbench
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:40 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> LGTM
>
> +1

Thanks to both of you for the reviews.  Please note that I will
mention the business with pg_ctl and logging in a new  thread and
remove the diff of pg_ctl.c from the previous patch, and that the doc
changes could be backpatched down to 12 for the relevant parts.  The
documentation for PG_COLORS is still missing, but that's not new and I
think that we had better handle that case separately by creating a new
section in the docs.  For now, let's wait a couple of days and see if
others have more thoughts to share about the doc patch of this thread.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Finally split StdRdOptions into HeapOptions andToastOptions
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add an optional timeout clause to isolationtester step.