On 2020-Mar-04, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:33 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I think I would like this feature to be in, but I'm not sure that the
> > shape is final yet. My points:
> >
> > a) I don't see any use for \dA as presented; I think the \dA+ output is
> > useful. Therefore my preference would be that \dA presents what the
> > latest patch has as \dA+. I think we should leave \dA+ unimplemented
> > for now; maybe we can use some use for it later on.
>
> Neither \dA or \dA+ are introduced or affected by this patch. If we
> like to change their behavior, we should probably do this separately
> from this patch.
Doh, you're right, sorry.
Looking only at the regress/expected/psql.out changes, I'm satisfied
with this version of the patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services