Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers
Date
Msg-id 20200128141850.GA30624@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Jan-27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Actually looking again, getRecordTimestamp is looking pretty strange.
> It looks much more natural by using nested switch/case blocks, as with
> this diff.  I think the compiler does a better job this way too.

I hadn't noticed I forgot to attach the diff here :-(

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited?