Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers
Date
Msg-id 20200127210627.GA17687@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Actually looking again, getRecordTimestamp is looking pretty strange.
It looks much more natural by using nested switch/case blocks, as with
this diff.  I think the compiler does a better job this way too.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mahendra Singh Thalor
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT performance bug/regression & JIT EXPLAIN