On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 08:33:28AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Eugen Konkov wrote:
> > ! Specifying a missing bound as exclusive is automatically converted
> > ! to inclusive, e.g., <literal>[,]</literal> is automatically converted
> > ! to <literal>(,)</literal>
> >
> > Misspell?
> >
> > You say:
> > exclusive is automatically converted to inclusive
> > But then:
> > [,] is automatically converted to (,)
> >
> > which one is correct?
>
> My mistake. Thanks for finding that. Updated patch attached, plus I
> improved the second paragraph.
Patch applied back through 9.4. Thank you for the feedback.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
