Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'? - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?
Date
Msg-id 20191106133328.GA1843@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?  (Eugen Konkov <kes-kes@yandex.ru>)
Responses Re: Why 'infinity' is not in range '[2019-01-02, infinity]'?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
On Wed, Nov  6, 2019 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Eugen Konkov wrote:
> !    Specifying a missing bound as exclusive is automatically converted
> !    to inclusive, e.g., <literal>[,]</literal> is automatically converted
> !    to <literal>(,)</literal>
> 
> Misspell?
> 
> You say:
>    exclusive is automatically converted  to inclusive
> But then:
>    [,] is automatically converted to (,)
> 
> which one is correct?

My mistake.  Thanks for finding that.  Updated patch attached, plus I
improved the second paragraph.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +

Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a Column documentation is misleading
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a Column documentation is misleading