Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
Date
Msg-id 20191223200809.GI32763@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 02:34:34PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I was working on some stuff for table AMs, and I got to wonder it we
> had better rename amapi.h to indexam.h and amapi.c to indexam.c, so as
> things are more consistent with table AM.  It is a bit annoying to
> name the files dedicated to index AMs with what looks like now a too
> generic name.  That would require switching a couple of header files
> for existing module developers, which is always annoying, but the move
> makes sense thinking long-term?

+1 for being more specific about which AM we're talking about.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: string literal continuations in C
Next
From: Ashwin Agrawal
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?