Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: error context for vacuum to include block number - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Date
Msg-id 20191216024956.GC2344@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: error context for vacuum to include block number  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: error context for vacuum to include block number  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Re: error context for vacuum to include block number  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:27:12AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I named it so because it calls both lazy_vacuum_index
> ("PROGRESS_VACUUM_PHASE_VACUUM_INDEX") and
> lazy_vacuum_heap("PROGRESS_VACUUM_PHASE_VACUUM_HEAP")
>
> I suppose you don't think the other way around is better?
> lazy_vacuum_index_heap

Dunno.  Let's see if others have other thoughts on the matter.  FWIW,
I have a long history at naming things in a way others don't like :)
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: What's the best way to get flex and bison on Windows?
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: standby crashed when replay block which truncated instandby but failed to truncate in master node