Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors
Date
Msg-id 20191204040811.GC6962@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Incomplete startup packet errors  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Jobin Augustine <jobinau@gmail.com> writes:
> > However, Checking whether the port is open is resulting in error log like:
> > 2019-11-25 14:03:44.414 IST [14475] LOG:  invalid length of startup packet
> > Yes, This is different from "Incomplete startup packet" discussed here.
>
> > Steps to reproduce:
> > $ telnet localhost 5432
>
> Well, the agreed-to behavior change was to not log anything if the
> connection is closed without any data having been sent.  If the
> client *does* send something, and it doesn't look like a valid
> connection request, I think we absolutely should log that.

Agreed.

Thanks,

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?