On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 11:22:20AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
>> I would rather keep the solution with client_min_messages, and the
>> tests in vacuum.sql to keep those checks for the grammar parsing. So
>> this basically brings us back to use the patch I proposed here:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20191107013942.GA1768@paquier.xyz
>
> OK.
Thanks, applied and back-patched.
--
Michael
