Re: Missing dependency tracking for TableFunc nodes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Missing dependency tracking for TableFunc nodes
Date
Msg-id 20191114213124.i6xwx24y26iklzds@development
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing dependency tracking for TableFunc nodes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Missing dependency tracking for TableFunc nodes
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:37:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com> writes:
>> On 11/11/19 1:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I happened to notice that find_expr_references_walker has not
>>> been taught anything about TableFunc nodes, which means it will
>>> miss the type and collation OIDs embedded in such a node.
>
>> I can consistently generate errors like the following in master:
>>    ERROR:  cache lookup failed for statistics object 31041
>
>This is surely a completely different issue --- there are not,
>one hopes, any extended-stats OIDs embedded in views or other
>query trees.
>
>I concur with Tomas' suspicion that this must be a race condition
>during DROP STATISTICS.  If we're going to allow people to do that
>separately from dropping the table(s), there has to be some kind of
>locking around it, and it sounds like there's not :-(
>

I think the right thing to do is simply acquire AE lock on the relation
in RemoveStatisticsById, per the attached patch. It's possible we'll
need to do something more complicated once join stats are added, but
for now this should be enough (and backpatchable).

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing dependency tracking for TableFunc nodes