On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 04:05:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:29:49PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 2:18 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >> There could be an argument for keeping
> >> GET_STRING_RELOPTION actually which is still useful to get a string
> >> value in an option set using the stored offset, and we have
> >> the recently-added dummy_index_am in this category. Any thoughts?
> >
> > Not sure, maybe +0.5 on keeping GET_STRING_RELOPTION.
>
> Thinking more about it, I would tend to keep this one around. I'll
> wait a couple of days before coming back to it.
Committed this one and kept GET_STRING_RELOPTION(). With the removal
of those macros, it is possible to actually move a portion of the
parsing definitions to reloptions.c for each type, but as we expose
the validation function string and the enum element definition that
would be more confusing IMO, so I have left that out.
--
Michael
