Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line
Date
Msg-id 20191108090757.GD1768@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line  (Mahendra Singh <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 12:02:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think it'd be a great idea to change parallel_schedule like
> that.  Independently adding test scripts to the same parallel batch
> probably won't end well: you might end up over the concurrency limit,
> or the scripts might conflict through sharing table names or the like.
> So I'd rather see that there's a conflict to worry about.
>
> Anyway, merge conflicts there aren't so common IME.

FWIW, I was not referring to the schedule files here, just to REGRESS
and ISOLATION in the modules' Makefiles.  If you think that's not
worth doing it, let's drop my suggestion then.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdwmessage.
Next
From: Gilles Darold
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdwmessage.