Hi,
On 2019-11-04 11:30:23 +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
> > ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes:
> >> I just noticed that when contrib/seg was converted to V1 calling
> >> convention (commit 389bb2818f4), the PG_GETARG_SEG_P() macro got defined
> >> in terms of PG_GETARG_POINTER(). But it itself calls DatumGetPointer(),
> >> so shouldn't it be using PG_GETARG_DATUM()?
> >
> > Yup, I agree. Pushed.
>
> Thanks!
Thanks both of you.
- Andres
