On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:06:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:23:45AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> If you want to use the same size array, then you might want to just
>> memset the previous array rather than first freeing it and then again
>> allocating it. This is not a big point, so any which way is fine.
>
> Sure. This is less expensive though, so changed it the way you
> are suggesting on my local branch.
I am attaching an updated patch for now that I would like to commit.
Are there more comments about the shape of the patch, the name of the
columns for the function, etc.?
--
Michael
