On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:23:45AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> We always return a single tuple/record from this function, so do we
> really need to return SETOF record or just returning record is
> sufficient?
Right (with the doc update).
> If you want to use the same size array, then you might want to just
> memset the previous array rather than first freeing it and then again
> allocating it. This is not a big point, so any which way is fine.
Sure. This is less expensive though, so changed it the way you
are suggesting on my local branch.
--
Michael
