Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Date
Msg-id 20190916134056.GB6026@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:46:16AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I don't see much use of separating information for infomask and infomask2.

Okay, using two separate columns leads to the attached.  Any thoughts?
This also includes a fix for cases with IS_LOCKED_ONLY and UPGRADED.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of NOTIFY over many databases (v2)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ecpglib major version changed