On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:38:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, it might be a good idea to make a sweep to see what other tests
> should be using safe_psql.
I found more of these while browsing all the tests, so I am just going
to start a new thread with a patch.
> Or, more radically, we could think about redefining PostgresNode::psql
> to complain about errors, and you have to use something else if you
> want it not to?
Not sure about redesigning that as it has been around for a couple of
years now, and that would mean perhaps a third wrapper on top of
PostgresNode::psql.
--
Michael
