On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:05:53AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-08-19 14:12:51 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> - 0002 makes vacuumdb and reindexdb fail when trying to assign a
>> socket with an unsupported range. Should this bit be backpatched? We
>> are doing that for vacuumdb for some time now, and the error is
>> confusing so I would prefer fixing it on older branches as well.
>
> Yea, I think we clearly need to. The code right now essentially is a
> wild write, albeit with a somewhat limited range of what it can impact.
Okay.
> I think the error message ought be reformulated, so users have a chance
> to actually understand what they need to change to avoid the error. At
> least something roughly like "too many jobs for this platform's select()".
pgbench needs an extra fix then?
> ISTM that we should fail in ParallelSlotsSetup(), rather than
> ParallelSlotsGetIdle() though? That's always going to be earlier, and
> there's no way to get into the problematic situation at a later point,
> no?
Okay, done this way. What do you think about the attached?
--
Michael
