Re: pgbench tests vs Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pgbench tests vs Windows
Date
Msg-id 20190724023616.GE14257@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgbench tests vs Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:13:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> I propose to prepare a patch along these lines. Alternatively we could
>> just drop it - I don't think the test matters all that hugely.
>
> I'd say try that, but if it doesn't work right away, just skip the
> test on Windows.

+1.  I don't see exactly why we should drop it either.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal documentation
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction