On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:03:16AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AYahorau@ibagroup.eu writes:
>> Do you have any thoughts regarding this issue?
>
> I do not think anybody thinks this is a bug. Setting wal_sender_timeout
> too small is a configuration mistake.
Yeah. I don't see any bug here. Please note that it can be also a
problem to set up a too high value in some configuration setups. The
lack of flexibility in this area is why wal_sender_timeout has been
switch to be user-settable in v12. In short you can configure it in
the connection string to enforce a custom value per standby.
--
Michael
