Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs
Date
Msg-id 20190625011659.GD5569@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs  (Dent John <denty@qqdd.eu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:47:09AM +0200, Dent John wrote:
> I’ll see if I can get the patch applied and feed back on how much it
> move towards making my use case a viable proposition.

There is another patch which provides more coverage for reloptions:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2064/

Based on my last lookup, I was rather unhappy with its shape because
of the assumptions behind the tests and the extra useless work it was
doing with parameter strings (the set of WARNING is also something we
don't need).  If we get that first in, we can then make sure that any
extra refactoring has hopefully no impact.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw
Next
From: Ian Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop ALTER SYSTEM from making bad assumptions