Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dent John
Subject Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs
Date
Msg-id 10B434FE-090D-45AF-9899-89420025EE1A@qqdd.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Use of reloptions by EXTENSIONs
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you, Tom.

(And sorry for the delay following up.)

I’ve marked myself down for review for this patch in the next CF.

I’ll see if I can get the patch applied and feed back on how much it move towards making my use case a viable
proposition. 

d.

> On 9 Jun 2019, at 17:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Dent John <denty@qqdd.eu> writes:
>> I guess my question is, and I correctly understanding that reloptions are basically off-limits to EXTENSIONS?
>
> IIRC that's basically true.  There's a lot of dissatisfaction with the
> current implementation of reloptions, although I think that it's been
> mainly focused on the fact that adding new ones is hard/error-prone
> even within the core code.  If you want to help move this along, you
> could review the existing patch in the area:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2083183.Rn7qOxG4Ov@x200m
>
> and/or propose additional changes.
>
>            regards, tom lane




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: benchmarking Flex practices
Next
From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Date:
Subject: Re: using explicit_bzero