Greetings,
* Joe Conway (mail@joeconway.com) wrote:
> On 6/16/19 9:45 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 07:07:20AM -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> >> In any case it doesn't address my first point, which is limiting the
> >> volume encrypted with the same key. Another valid reason is you might
> >> have data at varying sensitivity levels and prefer different keys be
> >> used for each level.
> >
> > That seems quite complex.
>
> How? It is no more complex than encrypting at the tablespace level
> already gives you - in that case you get this property for free if you
> care to use it.
Perhaps not surprising, but I'm definitely in agreement with Joe
regarding having multiple keys when possible and (reasonably)
straight-forward to do so. I also don't buy off on the OpenSSL
argument; their more severe issues certainly haven't been due to key
management issues such as what we're discussing here, so I don't think
the argument applies.
Thanks,
Stephen
