Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6
Date
Msg-id 20190507160913.57s2ensw4h4g2wxk@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-05-07 12:07:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > Yea, that might be right. I'm planning to leave the tests in until a
> > bunch of the open REINDEX issues are resolved. Not super likely that
> > it'd break something, but probably worth anyway?
> 
> The number of deadlock failures is kind of annoying, so I'd rather remove
> the tests from HEAD sooner than later.  What issues around that do you
> think remain that these tests would be helpful for?

I was wondering about
https://postgr.es/m/20190430151735.wi52sxjvxsjvaxxt%40alap3.anarazel.de
but perhaps it's too unlikely to break anything the tests would detect
though.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch