On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 07:08:10PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:34:52AM +0000, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Fix union for pgstat message types
>
> > Should the tempfile bit be backported? That message was added in 9.2.
>
> It's just cosmetic I think. The main point of having everything in
> the union is to make sure the union's size/alignment are sufficient,
> but the tempfile message isn't anywhere near creating an issue there.
>
> That was my thought as well. It's really only needed when we add new
> things, to make sure we don't make those mistakes again. And nobody should
> be adding new pgstat messages in old branches.
Fine with me, I don't think the backbranches are broken. OTOH it's a
minor change that would make the code more similar.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
