Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Date
Msg-id 20190429035846.GA2954@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 01:14:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not particularly on topic, but: including a patch version number in your
> subject headings is pretty unfriendly IMO, because it breaks threading
> for people whose MUAs do threading by matching up subject lines.

Thanks for letting me know about those MUAs.

> I don't actually see the point of the [PATCH] annotation at all,
> because the thread is soon going to contain lots of messages with
> the same subject line but no embedded patch.  Like this one.  So
> it's just noise with no information content worth noticing.

OK

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Avinash Kumar
Date:
Subject: Do you see any problems with this procedure for Old Master rebuild asa Slave upon switchover ?
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql