Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
Date
Msg-id 12062.1556471641@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: [PATCH v5] Show detailed table persistence in \dt+
List pgsql-hackers
Not particularly on topic, but: including a patch version number in your
subject headings is pretty unfriendly IMO, because it breaks threading
for people whose MUAs do threading by matching up subject lines.

I don't actually see the point of the [PATCH] annotation at all, because
the thread is soon going to contain lots of messages with the same subject
line but no embedded patch.  Like this one.  So it's just noise with no
information content worth noticing.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck