Re: Odd behavior of partitioned ALTER TABLE ONLY ... ADD PRIMARY KEY - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Odd behavior of partitioned ALTER TABLE ONLY ... ADD PRIMARY KEY
Date
Msg-id 20190421193613.GA13330@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Odd behavior of partitioned ALTER TABLE ONLY ... ADD PRIMARY KEY  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Odd behavior of partitioned ALTER TABLE ONLY ... ADD PRIMARY KEY
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Apr-21, Tom Lane wrote:

> ISTM that this is a bug, not a feature: if there's any point at
> all to saying ONLY in this context, it's that we're not supposed
> to be doing anything as expensive as adding a new constraint to
> a child partition.  No?  So I think that this should have failed.

Hmm, yeah, this is not intentional and I agree that it shouldn't be
doing this.

> We need to require the partition(s) to already have attnotnull set.

Sounds good to me, yes.

Do you want me to see about this?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Add \echo_stderr to psql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd behavior of partitioned ALTER TABLE ONLY ... ADD PRIMARY KEY